nti.media
Dearness Allowance Increased by 3% in Pre-Poll Gift for 1 Crore Central Govt Employees and Pensioners - News18      |       Pulwama incident has bolstered US resolve to cooperate with India on terror: US ambassador to India - Times of India      |       Kulbhushan Jadhav ICJ hearing LIVE: India's claim for release and return of Jadhav "outlandish", says Pakistan - Moneycontrol.com      |       After Pulwama, 2,500 Young Kashmiri Men Apply For 111 Vacancies In Army - NDTV News      |       Manoj Joshi on Navjot Singh Sidhu’s Comment on Pulwama Attack: It’s for Political benefits - News18      |       Country will never forget the sacrifice made by the soldiers in Pulwama: PM Narendra Modi - Times Now      |       People Mocking Vande Bharat Express Should Be Punished, Says PM Modi - NDTV News      |       ‘Boycott Kashmiris’: Meghalaya Governor Tathagata Roy’s tweet sparks row, Omar Abdullah has a quest... - Hindustan Times      |       The Hindu Analysis | Why is Saudi Arabia's Prince Mohammed bin Salman's Indian visit crucial - The Hindu      |       Senator Bernie Sanders Announces Run For US Presidency In 2020 - NDTV News      |       Pakistan seeks urgent UN intervention to de-escalate fresh tensions with India - The Indian Express      |       Rupee goes from Asia's best to worst as oil, Pulwama puncture mood - Economic Times      |       Startups Cheer As Government Eases Angel Tax Norms, Widens Definition - BloombergQuint      |       Ola Announces Sachin Bansal Has Invested Rs. 650 Crores in His Personal Capacity - NDTV      |       Closing Bell: Sensex ends 145 pts lower, Nifty manages to hold 10,600; IT stocks drag - Moneycontrol.com      |       Explained: Why Jet Airways is being sold for Re 1 - The Indian Express      |       Samsung Galaxy Fold Will Be the Name of Samsung's Foldable Phone, Tipster Claims Ahead of Launch - NDTV      |       Flipkart Mobile Bonanza sale: Redmi Note 6 Pro, Realme 2 Pro and other top mobiles under Rs 15000 - The Indian Express      |       Another alleged OnePlus 7 live image leaks, skips the notch - gizmochina      |       Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro: 5 things you need to know about the new budget phone - Hindustan Times      |       Katrina Kaif shoots for Bharat but it is Gully Boy and its stars Ranveer Singh and Alia Bhatt who get... - Hindustan Times      |       These candid shots of Sara Ali Khan heading back home from the gym will win your heart in a jiffy - see photos - Times Now      |       Kangana Ranaut On Manikarnika: 'People Would Have Disowned It If It Were Bad Film' - NDTV News      |       Malaika Arora reveals what happened night before her divorce from Arbaaz Khan - India Today      |       IPL 2019 schedule announced for first 2 weeks - Cricbuzz - Cricbuzz      |       'We play like we're No.2 and we're chasing somebody' – Eoin Morgan - International Cricket Council      |       Manchester United's win at Chelsea thanks to Solskjaer's game plan - Mata - ESPN      |       Pakistan must be destroyed! - Times of India      |       Super Snow Moon Tonight: February’s Full Moon Is Biggest Super Moon of 2019 - NDTV      |       Watch Israel's historic moon launch live - From the Grapevine      |       To infinity and beyond! China wants to build the first power station in space - The Financial Express      |       NASA firms up plans to send a crewed spacecraft to Mars - THE WEEK      |       Here's What You Need to Know About the Gene Causing Obesity - News18      |       Associations between low- and high-dose oral fluconazole and pregnancy outcomes: 3 nested case–control studies - CMAJ      |       Discovery of immune cells to pave way for universal flu vaccine - details inside - Times Now      |       Beware! Smoking More Than 20 Cigarettes A Day Could Damage Your Vision - NDTV News      |      

Talking Point


Supreme Court Did Away With The Troublesome Part Of Section 377

It is important to remember that the apex court has not scrapped Section 377


supreme-court-did-away-with-the-troublesome-part-of-section-377

four-judge Supreme Court Bench led by Chief Justice Dipak Misra did the most sensible thing. As Chief Justice Dipak Misra wrote: “Section 377 IPC, so far as it penalizes any consensual sexual activity between two adults, be it homosexuals (man and a man), heterosexuals (man and a woman) and lesbians (woman and a woman), cannot be regarded as constitutional. However, if anyone, by which we mean both a man and a woman, engages in any kind of sexual activity with an animal, the said aspect of Section 377 IPC is constitutional and it shall remain a penal offence under Section 377 IPC.”

The petitioners were rightly and only concerned with consenting adults engaged in homosexual relationship implied in Section 377. The Supreme Court rightly responded declaring that consensual sex between two adults of the same sex cannot be an offence.

The four judges were overturning the earlier Suresh Koushal verdict of the court which had overturned the Delhi High Court verdict de-criminalising homosexuality. The present judgment had to establish the legal rationale against the Suresh Koushal verdict. But the court in doing so has gone a little too poetic, too rhetorical and too ideological in putting forward the doctrine of “transformative constitutionalism”. Chief Justice Dipak Misra says, “Our Constitution has been perceived to be transformative in the sense that the interpretation of its provisions should not be limited to the mere literal meaning of its words; instead they ought to be given a meaningful construction which is reflective of their intent and purpose in consonance with the changing times.” This is fuzzy thinking at best. Even the distinction that has been sought to be made between “constitutional morality” and “social morality” is unconvincing.

The crux of the issue is that fundamental rights cannot be violated even if they concern just an individual or a small group of individuals. Chief Justice Misra rightly states: “...for the language employed in Part III of the Constitution as well as the intention of the framers of our Constitution mandates that the Courts must step in whenever there is a violation of the fundamental rights, even if the right/s of a single individual is/are in peril.”

Justice Indu Malhotra in her concurrent judgment has reiterated the point: “The mere fact that the LGBT persons constitute a “minuscule fraction” of the country’s population cannot be a ground to deprive them of their Fundamental Rights guaranteed by Part III of the Constitution. Even though the LGBT constitute a sexual minority, members of the LGBT community are citizens of this country who are equally entitled to the enforcement of their Fundamental Rights guaranteed by Articles 14, 15, 19, and 21. “

Both Justices Rohinton Mistry and D.Y.Chandrachud had traced the origins of Section 377 to English law based on Judaeo-Christian principles, and both said that like in the triple talaq case, when an idea or principle militates against common sense and rationality, then the offending provision must go. But all of them had to stop short of scrapping the provision in toto. They held that only consenting adults of a same-sex relationship will be free from the penal provisions of Section 377. Justice Chandrachud was quite unhappy with the fact the government did not take a stand in the matter.

advertisement