'I Feel This Verdict is Wrong, All That We Wanted Was A Probe': Prashant Bhushan - News18      |       Rajasthan Election Result 2018 LIVE: Congress final decision on CM before noon; Pilot, Gehlot urge for calm - Moneycontrol.com      |       Kamal blooms in MP, talks for Rajasthan drag on till late night - Times of India      |       President Sirisena’s dissolution of Parliament illegal, rules Sri Lanka Supreme Court - The Hindu      |       BJP-led Centre thinks it owns RBI: P Chidambaram - Moneycontrol.com      |       Election Results LIVE: Kamal Nath Beats Scindia to CM Chair in MP as Rahul Chooses Experience Over Youth - News18      |       TRS leader K. Chandrashekhar Rao sworn in as Telangana CM for second straight term - The Hindu      |       Rahul Gandhi holds individual meetings with Rajasthan CM hopefuls Ashok Gehlot, Sachin Pilot - Times of India      |       US Senate Votes To Condemn Saudi Crown Prince For Jamal Khashoggi Killing - NDTV News      |       Suspect In France Christmas Market Attack Killed In Gunfight: Officials - NDTV News      |       Trump Considering Son-In-Law Jared Kushner As Next Chief Of Staff: Report - NDTV News      |       Day after no-confidence vote, British Prime Minister Theresa May heads to Brussels - The Hindu      |       Market Live: Sensex, Nifty marginally lower after 3-day rally; HUL, HCL Tech fall - Moneycontrol.com      |       Market Live: Nifty falls after 3-day rally; November WPI eases to 4.64% - Moneycontrol.com      |       Supreme Court Puts Fortis Healthcare Sale To IHH On Hold - BloombergQuint      |       After Market: IndiGo flies high; Sun Pharma, YES Bank crack - Economic Times      |       Amazon, Flipkart beware! Google enters e-commerce, launches new shopping search features for Indian users - The Financial Express      |       Facebook is expanding its video platform while reportedly slashing news show funding - The Verge      |       Qualcomm Asks Chinese Courts to Ban iPhone XS, iPhone XR Sales - Gadgets 360      |       MIUI 10 ported to the OnePlus 6 and 6T - GSMArena.com news - GSMArena.com      |       After lavish wedding, Ambanis to host reception at Jio Gardens for Isha, Anand - Economic Times      |       Simmba song Tere Bin: Check out the recreated version of classic Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan track ft. Ranveer-Sara - Times Now      |       Aquaman movie review: The Jason Momoa film is a washout - The Indian Express      |       Alia Bhatt Gives Hilarious Response to a Fan Who Asked If He Could Call Her 'Alia Kapoor' - News18      |       India vs Australia Live Score, 2nd Test Day 1: Bumrah gets rid of Finch - Times of India      |       Perth stadium off the mark with Finch, Harris domination - Cricbuzz      |       Premier League: Liverpool Face Manchester United Test As Manchester City Look To Get Back Into.. - NDTV Sports      |       Live Cricket Score: Bangladesh vs Windies, 3rd ODI - Cricbuzz      |       Geminid meteor shower 2018: All you need to know about it, how to watch from India - India Today      |       InSight lander takes its first selfie on Mars: NASA - The Tribune India      |       Draw clearer red lines around human gene editing, say leaders of Chinese and U.S. science academies - Science Magazine      |       Australia's scientific body to provide support for European Space Agency's tracking station - Xinhua | English.news.cn - Xinhua      |       Caffeine therapy can boost brain development in preemies - The Sentinel Assam      |       Merry Christmas! Pass the defibrillator! - Cosmos      |       India witnessing rise in dementia-related cases - The Shillong Times      |       Google launches AI project in Thailand to screen for diabetic eye disease - Hindustan Times      |      

Talking Point

Supreme Court Did Away With The Troublesome Part Of Section 377

It is important to remember that the apex court has not scrapped Section 377


four-judge Supreme Court Bench led by Chief Justice Dipak Misra did the most sensible thing. As Chief Justice Dipak Misra wrote: “Section 377 IPC, so far as it penalizes any consensual sexual activity between two adults, be it homosexuals (man and a man), heterosexuals (man and a woman) and lesbians (woman and a woman), cannot be regarded as constitutional. However, if anyone, by which we mean both a man and a woman, engages in any kind of sexual activity with an animal, the said aspect of Section 377 IPC is constitutional and it shall remain a penal offence under Section 377 IPC.”

The petitioners were rightly and only concerned with consenting adults engaged in homosexual relationship implied in Section 377. The Supreme Court rightly responded declaring that consensual sex between two adults of the same sex cannot be an offence.

The four judges were overturning the earlier Suresh Koushal verdict of the court which had overturned the Delhi High Court verdict de-criminalising homosexuality. The present judgment had to establish the legal rationale against the Suresh Koushal verdict. But the court in doing so has gone a little too poetic, too rhetorical and too ideological in putting forward the doctrine of “transformative constitutionalism”. Chief Justice Dipak Misra says, “Our Constitution has been perceived to be transformative in the sense that the interpretation of its provisions should not be limited to the mere literal meaning of its words; instead they ought to be given a meaningful construction which is reflective of their intent and purpose in consonance with the changing times.” This is fuzzy thinking at best. Even the distinction that has been sought to be made between “constitutional morality” and “social morality” is unconvincing.

The crux of the issue is that fundamental rights cannot be violated even if they concern just an individual or a small group of individuals. Chief Justice Misra rightly states: “...for the language employed in Part III of the Constitution as well as the intention of the framers of our Constitution mandates that the Courts must step in whenever there is a violation of the fundamental rights, even if the right/s of a single individual is/are in peril.”

Justice Indu Malhotra in her concurrent judgment has reiterated the point: “The mere fact that the LGBT persons constitute a “minuscule fraction” of the country’s population cannot be a ground to deprive them of their Fundamental Rights guaranteed by Part III of the Constitution. Even though the LGBT constitute a sexual minority, members of the LGBT community are citizens of this country who are equally entitled to the enforcement of their Fundamental Rights guaranteed by Articles 14, 15, 19, and 21. “

Both Justices Rohinton Mistry and D.Y.Chandrachud had traced the origins of Section 377 to English law based on Judaeo-Christian principles, and both said that like in the triple talaq case, when an idea or principle militates against common sense and rationality, then the offending provision must go. But all of them had to stop short of scrapping the provision in toto. They held that only consenting adults of a same-sex relationship will be free from the penal provisions of Section 377. Justice Chandrachud was quite unhappy with the fact the government did not take a stand in the matter.