With poll Mahakumbh looming, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra takes political plunge - Times of India      |       Piyush Goyal named interim Finance Minister - Moneycontrol.com      |       Nine held for ISIS links planned mass killings by mixing poison in food and drinks: Maharashtra ATS - Times Now      |       Rare photos of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose Photogallery - Times of India - Times of India      |       Selection committee to meet on Thursday for appointment of new CBI Director - Zee News      |       After Amit Shah, Smriti Irani's helicopter lands into controversy - Hindustan Times      |       Fact check: Claims of 'cyber expert' who alleged that EVMs can be hacked do not withstand scrutiny - Scroll.in      |       Railway Minister Piyush Goyal announces 2.50 lakh additional vacancies; 10% quota applicable - The Indian Express      |       Venezuela opposition leader declares himself interim president - Times of India      |       Pak Cops Sacked For Fake Encounter Of 4 In Car; 3 Children Survived - NDTV News      |       Kamala Harris raises over $1 million within 24 hours of her presidential bid announcement - The Hindu      |       Emiliano Sala missing plane: Search resumes as details emerge of messages of fear Cardiff striker sent to friend before disappearance - Goal.com      |       Vodafone plans $3.5 billion war chest to fight richest Asian - Economic Times      |       2019 Maruti Wagon R Waiting Period: When To Expect Delivery? - CarDekho      |       Tata Motors bets big on Harrier - The Hindu      |       IndiGo operator's Q3 net profit at Rs 191 crore on adverse impact of crude, rupee - Moneycontrol.com      |       Honor View 20 launched with punch-hole display, 48MP camera: Price, specs, India launch details - India Today      |       Apple Asks iPhone Users to Share Best Photos - News18      |       Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 gets its final MIUI 10 stable update - XDA Developers      |       Apple Will Move to a Complete OLED iPhone Range in 2020 - News18      |       A Glimpse From Priyanka Chopra And Nick Jonas' 'Fairy Tale' Wedding, Courtesy Anusha Dandekar - NDTV News      |       Yami Gautam says army defines the real meaning of patriotism - Times Now      |       Prateik Babbar to Tie the Knot with Longtime Girlfriend Sanya Sagar in Lucknow Today, See Pics - News18      |       Top 5 Celebrity Instagrammers of the Day (Photos) - India TV      |       Kohli rested for last two ODIs, T20 series - Deccan Herald      |       Pakistan captain Sarfraz Ahmed apologises for his racial comments - Times of India      |       Australian Open: Serena Williams stunned by Pliskova fightback, bows out in quarter-final - The Hindu      |       India vs New Zealand: Bowling with the same speed as I was before injury, says Mohammed Shami - The Indian Express      |       Total lunar eclipse visible across California - Xinhua | English.news.cn - Xinhua      |       Greenland is approaching the threshold of an irreversible melt, and the consequences for coastal cities could - Business Insider India      |       New fabric can harvest body heat to power small wearables, shows research - Express Computer      |       Here's Why Elon Musk's Extremely Shiny Starship Is Made Out of Stainless Steel - ScienceAlert      |       Negative Experiences on Facebook Will Make You Lonely - News18      |       In stress? Remember Your Romantic Partner to Keep BP in Control - News18      |       Diabetes: How Eating Black Rice May Help Regulate Blood Sugar Levels - NDTV News      |       Hyderabad: Bad news for exhibition goers - The Siasat Daily      |      


Government On The Backfoot In The CBI Affair

The centre and the CVC have also been asked to file their response to Verma's petition on the steps taken against him


By Amulya Ganguli

It cannot but be politically embarrassing for the Narendra Modi government that the decision to send two squabbling Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) officials on leave by the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC), presumably at the government's behest, has barely passed muster in the Supreme Court.

The court may not have reinstated the director, Alok Verma, and the special director, Rakesh Asthana, but it has requested a retired Supreme Court judge, A.K. Patnaik, to monitor the CVC's probe into the allegations against Verma which led to his removal. The centre and the CVC have also been asked to file their response to Verma's petition on the steps taken against him.

Any presumption on the government's part, therefore, that its intervention in the CBI in what has been called by its critics as a midnight coup will mean that it will be back to business in the organisation under a new director, M. Nageswara Rao, has been belied.

Far from being defused, the controversy has only been put on the back burner with the court virtually assuming the role of governing the premier investigative agency with Rao being told not to take any policy decisions. 

For any government, the loss of control over a major institution is tantamount to a loss of face. It is also a godsend to the opposition. Till now, the latter had been groping for an issue with which to attack the government in the run-up to the assembly elections in five states.

But, now, even more than the Rafael aircraft deal which is being used by the Congress to accuse the government of crony capitalism,
l'affaire CBI will give the party a handy stick with which to beat the ruling dispensation.

The latter, too, and also the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), will be worried about the impact of the court case on the middle class. If it transpires that there is a grain of truth in the charge that the root of the infighting at the top of the organisation was the foisting of what has been called the ruling party's blue-eyed boy, Asthana, in the CBI, then the reaction of the volatile middle class cannot be favourable.

This influential group may be willing to bide its time before the promises of
vikas are fulfilled. But any suggestion that the government was undermining the autonomy of a generally well-regarded institution by playing favourites with the officials can have politically damaging consequences.

As it is, the CBI had been called a "caged parrot" by the Supreme Court when it was described as the "Congress Bureau of Investigation" when Manmohan Singh was the prime minister. The expectation was that the outfit would be put back on its feet by the new dispensation so that it would be able to retain its reputation for integrity and efficiency. But the latest turn of events suggests that the more things change, the more they remain the same.

One reason why the CBI had become the last resort for all controversial cases was the steady deterioration in the impartiality and competence of the police, which had long become a plaything in the hands of politicians where bending the rules were concerned.

If the CBI is also seen to be going down the same path, the government will have to share a great deal of the blame. The chances of this happening are high considering that the Supreme Court will deal with a petition by a non-government organisation on a probe into the allegations of corruption against Asthana and other CBI officials. 

It cannot be a matter of solace to the government that the Supreme Court is increasingly assuming the role of an arbiter in areas where the government and the legislature should have had the final say such as determining the rights of homosexuals or the entry of women into temples.

If the government is in retreat in these matters, the reason apparently is that it is unable to evolve a consensus among all the parties about the right step not only because of the varying opinions among
them, but also because it is unwilling to adopt a bold approach of the kind which the judiciary is doing. 

Since the government seems to prefer to opt for the soft option of leaving a controversial matter to the judges, it cannot afford to carp against judicial activism, as it occasionally does, or advise the judiciary not to be guided by "five-star" activists, as the prime minister once did. 

The CBI affair is a reaffirmation, therefore, of the need for the judiciary to set things right because of the inadequacies of the first two "estates" - the government and the legislature.

In the CBI's case, the Supreme Court had no option but to step in because the aggrieved officials approached it for redressal. But, in general, the gradual widening of the judiciary's ambit will be welcomed because of its growing reputation for taking sensible decisions as nearly all the recent instances have shown.

In contrast, the government has been seen to be either hesitant, as on decriminalising homosexuality and upholding the right to privacy, or obscurantist as in the case of women entering a temple which bars those who are between 10 and 50 years old.